Special Considerations in Face Transplantation: A Systematic Review.

ABSTRACT: Vascularized composite allotransplantation of the face is an exceedingly complex procedure, requiring extensive planning and surgical precision in order to successfully manage patients with facial disfigurements. This review aims to present an overview of the salient anatomic considerations in facial transplantation, as well as give attention to unique patient populations and special considerations.A literature review was performed in search of articles pertaining to considerations in facial transplantation using the databases PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane. Articles selected for further review included full-text articles with an emphasis on specific anatomic defects and how they were addressed in the transplant process, as well as management of special patient populations undergoing facial transplantation. In total, 19 articles were deemed appropriate for inclusion.The use of computer-assisted technologies for the planning portion of the procedure, as well as intraoperative efficiency, has yielded favorable results and can be considered as part of the operative plan. The ultimate outcome is dependent upon the synchronization of subunits of the allograft and the desired functional outcomes, including osseous, ocular, oral, and otologic considerations. Management of specific pathology and subgroups of patients are critical aspects. Although pediatric face transplantation has not yet been performed, it is a likely a future step in the evolution of this procedure.When performing a face transplantation, many components must be considered pre-, intra-, and post-operatively. This systematic review presents specific anatomic considerations, as well as information about special patient populations within this crosssection of multidisciplinary microsurgery, psychiatry, and transplant immunology.

Cranioplasty Outcomes From 500 Consecutive Neuroplastic Surgery Patients.

BACKGROUND: Cranioplasty is critical to cerebral protection and restoring intracranial physiology, yet this procedure is fraught with a high risk of complications. The field of neuroplastic surgery was created to improve skull and scalp reconstruction outcomes in adult neurosurgical patients, with the hypothesis that a multidisciplinary team approach could help decrease complications. OBJECTIVE: To determine outcomes from a cohort of cranioplasty surgeries performed by a neuroplastic surgery team using a consistent surgical technique and approach. METHODS: The authors reviewed 500 consecutive adult neuroplastic surgery cranioplasties that were performed between January 2012 and September 2020. Data were abstracted from a prospectively maintained database. Univariate analysis was performed to determine association between demographic, medical, and surgical factors and odds of revision surgery. RESULTS: Patients were followed for an average of 24 months. Overall, there was a reoperation rate of 15.2% (n = 76), with the most frequent complications being infection (7.8%, n = 39), epidural hematoma (2.2%, n = 11), and wound dehiscence (1.8%, n = 9). New onset seizures occurred in 6 (1.2%) patients.Several variables were associated with increased odds of revision surgery, including lower body mass ratio, 2 or more cranial surgeries, presence of hydrocephalus shunts, scalp tissue defects, large-sized skull defect, and autologous bone flaps. importantly, implants with embedded neurotechnology were not associated with increased odds of reoperation. CONCLUSIONS: These results allow for comparison of multiple factors that impact risk of complications after cranioplasty and lay the foundation for development of a cranioplasty risk stratification scheme. Further research in neuroplastic surgery is warranted to examine how designated centers concentrating on adult neuro-cranial reconstruction and multidisciplinary collaboration may lead to improved cranioplasty outcomes and decreased risks of complications in neurosurgical patients.

Airway Management of COVID-19 Positive Patients Aboard USNS COMFORT Mission to New York City.

During the USNS Comfort mobilization to New York City in response to the pandemic, the ship's medical team cared for over 35 mechanically ventilated corona virus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infected patients. Due to the better than expected mortality rates of these patients, tracheotomy for prolonged intubation or other indicated interventional bronchoscopies were performed on 7 COVID positive patients, as well as 2 with negative screening tests. No member of the health care team subsequently became symptomatic or tested positive for COVID-19. This was in part due to the formation of a dedicated surgical airway team, use of standardized procedural techniques and personal protective equipment (PPE), and construction of a negative pressure operating room within the COVID-19 isolation ward on the ship. This experience shows that tracheotomies and other aerosolizing procedures can be performed with due concern for patient and provider safety, regardless of patient's COVID status.

Neuroplastic Surgery Aboard USNS Comfort During the COVID-19 Pandemic in New York City.

In December of 2019, a novel virus known as severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) produced a cluster of viral pneumonia cases in Wuhan, China. In the United States (US), New York City was particularly devastated, with the volume and acuity of patients placing an unprecedented strain on the hospital system and health care workers. In response to this crisis, USNS Comfort (T-AH 20) was deployed to New York City with a 1100 member medical team to augment local hospitals. Comfort's mission to New York City was dynamic, and required special adaptation to care for both COVID positive and COVID negative patients. Neuroplastic surgery procedures were indicated in both COVID positive and COVID negative patients, and lessons learned with regard to performance of complex surgery in an unfamiliar environment consisted of developing a thorough understanding of ones capabilities, and working with a highly skilled team of Navy surgeons, anesthesiologists, and surgical support staff, in order to provide high quality care in a deployment platform.

Misconceptions About Negative Pressure Rooms and Their Impact Aboard USNS Comfort in New York City.

The outbreak of novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has had a momentous impact on the field of otolaryngology due to the high number of aerosol-generating procedures involving the upper aerodigestive tract. These procedures bear significant risk to the provider and clinical environment due to the possibility of viral aerosolization. While significant attention has been appropriately paid to personal protective equipment during this pandemic, an understanding of industrial hygiene is also necessary for the safe delivery of health care to mitigate the risk of exposure to other patients and health care workers. We provide a review of air ventilation practices and their role in reducing pathogen spread. In addition, we share our experiences with effectively treating COVID-19-positive patients aboard the USNS Comfort through proper environment control measures.

Risk of Complications in Primary Versus Revision-Type Cranioplasty.

INTRODUCTION: Cranioplasty (CP) is a multifaceted procedure in a heterogenous patient population, with a high risk for complication. However, no previous large-scale studies have compared outcomes in primary (ie, first attempt) CP versus revision CP (ie, following previous attempts). The authors, therefore, analyzed long-term outcomes of 506 consecutive primary and revision CPs, performed by a single surgeon. METHODS: All CPs performed between 2012 and 2019 were analyzed under IRB protocol approval. Surgeries were categorized as either primary (no previous CP; n = 279) or revision CP (at least one previous CP; n = 227). Complications were defined as either major or minor. Subgroup analyses investigated whether or not CP complication risk directly correlated with the number of previous neuro-cranial surgeries and/or CP attempts. RESULTS: The primary CP group experienced a major complication rate of 9% (26/279). In comparison, the revision CP group demonstrated a major complication rate of 32% (73/227). For the revision CP group, the rate of major complications rose with each additional surgery, from 4% (1 prior surgery) to 17% (2 prior surgeries) to 39% (3-4 prior surgeries) to 47% (≥5 prior surgeries). CONCLUSION: In a review of 506 consecutive cases, patients undergoing revision CP had a 3-fold increase in incidence of major complications, as compared to those undergoing primary CP. These results provide critical insight into overall CP risk stratification and may guide preoperative risk-benefit discussions. Furthermore, these findings may support a center-of-excellence care model, particularly for those patients with a history of previous neuro-cranial surgeries and/or CP attempts.

Adult Cranioplasty.

OBJECTIVES: After reading this article, the participant should be able to: Understand the etiology of cranial defects. Understand the anatomy of the cranium. Understand the importance of the preoperative workup in the cranial reconstruction decision-making process. Describe the options available for calvarial reconstruction including autologous and alloplastic materials. Describe the basic differences between available alloplastic materials. Understand the intraoperative and postoperative complications that may arise during cranioplasty. SUMMARY: Cranial defects can arise from a variety of causes, yielding a diverse group of patients who require cranioplasty. The goals of calvarial reconstruction are to protect the underlying brain, to restore the aesthetic contour of the calvarium, and/or to treat postcraniectomy cerebrospinal fluid circulation abnormalities that may be symptomatic. Options for calvarial reconstruction include the autogenous bone flap that was removed for access, autologous bone grafting, and a variety of alloplastic materials such as titanium, hydroxyapatite, polymethylmethacrylate, polyether ether ketone, and high-density porous polyethylene. A detailed preoperative workup and discussion with the patient is important to choosing the appropriate reconstructive path.

First-in-Human Experience With Integration of a Hydrocephalus Shunt Device Within a Customized Cranial Implant.

BACKGROUND: Implantable shunt devices are critical and life saving for hydrocephalus patients. However, these devices are fraught with high complication rates including scalp dehiscence, exposure, and extrusion. In fact, high shunt valve profiles are correlated with increased complications compared to those with lower profiles. As such, we sought a new method for integrating shunt valves for those challenging patients presenting with scalp-related complications. OBJECTIVE: To safely implant and integrate a hydrocephalus shunt valve device within a customized cranial implant, in an effort to limit its high-profile nature as a main contributor to shunt failure and scalp breakdown, and at the same time, improve patient satisfaction by preventing contour deformity. METHODS: A 64-yr-old male presented with an extruding hydrocephalus shunt valve and chronic, open scalp wound. The shunt valve was removed and temporary shunt externalization was performed. He received 2 wk of culture-directed antibiotics. Next, a contralateral craniectomy was performed allowing a new shunt valve system to be implanted within a low-profile, customized cranial implant. All efforts were made, at the patient's request, to decrease the high-profile nature of the shunt valve contributing to his most recent complication. RESULTS: First-in-human implantation was performed without complication. Postoperative shunt identification and programming was uncomplicated. The high-profile nature of the shunt valve was decreased by 87%. At 10 mo, the patient has experienced no complications and is extremely satisfied with his appearance. CONCLUSION: This first-in-human experience suggests that a high-profile hydrocephalus shunt device may be safely integrated within a customized cranial implant.

Full-Thickness Skin Grafting for Local Defect Coverage Following Scalp Adjacent Tissue Transfer in the Setting of Cranioplasty.

INTRODUCTION: Numerous techniques have been described to overcome scalp deficiency and high-tension closure at time of cranioplasty. However, there is an existing controversy, over when and if a free flap is needed during complex skull reconstruction (ie, cranioplasty). As such the authors present here our experience using full-thickness skin grafts (FTSGs) to cover local defects following scalp adjacent tissue transfer in the setting of cranioplasty. METHODS: By way of an institutional review board-approved database, the authors identified patients treated over a 3-year period spanning January 2015 to December 2017, who underwent scalp reconstruction using the technique presented here. Patient demographics, clinical characteristics, technical details, outcomes, and long-term follow up were statistically analyzed for the purpose of this study. RESULTS: Thirty-three patients, who underwent combined cranioplasty and scalp reconstruction using an FTSG for local donor site coverage, were identified. Twenty-five (75%) patients were considered to have "high complexity" scalp defects prior to reconstruction. Of them, 12 patients (36%) were large-sized and 20 (60%) medium-sized; 21 (64%) grafts were inset over vascularized muscle or pericranium while the remaining grafts were placed over bare calvarial bone. In total, the authors found 94% (31/33) success for all FTSGs in this cohort. Two of the skin grafts failed due to unsuccessful take. Owing to the high rate of success in this series, none of the patient's risk factors were found to correlate with graft failure. In addition, the success rate did not differ whether the graft was placed over bone verses over vascularized muscle/pericranium. CONCLUSION: In contrary to previous studies that have reported inconsistent success with full-thickness skin grafting in this setting, the authors present a simple technique with consistent results-as compared to other more complex reconstructive methods-even in the setting of highly complex scalp reconstruction and simultaneous cranioplasty.

Post-Neurosurgical Temporal Deformities: Various Techniques for Correction and Associated Complications.

INTRODUCTION: An irregular craniofacial contour along the temporal fossa, known commonly as 'temporal hollowing deformity,' (THD) can arise from multiple etiologies. In fact, up to half of all patients who undergo neurosurgical pterional dissections develop some form of temporal contour deformities. Unfortunately, temporal hollowing correction remains surgically challenging with many techniques resulting in high rates of failure and/or morbidity. METHODS: Herein, we describe anatomy contributing to postsurgical temporal deformity as well as time-tested prevention and surgical correction techniques. In addition, a review of 25 articles summarizing various techniques and complication profiles associated with temporal hollowing correction are presented. RESULTS: Complications included infection, implant malposition, revision surgery, pain, and implant removal because of implant-related complications Augmentation with either autologous fat or dermal filler is associated with the highest number of reported complications, including catastrophic events such as stroke, pulmonary embolism, and death. No such complications were reported with use of alloplastic material, use of autologous bone, or free tissue transfer. Furthermore, careful attention to adequate temporalis muscle resuspension and position remain paramount for stable restoration of craniofacial symmetry. CONCLUSIONS: Catastrophic complications were associated with injection augmentation of both fat and dermal filler in the temporal region. In contrast, use of alloplastic materials was not found to be associated with any catastrophic complications. As such, for the most severe cases of THD, we prefer to employ alloplastic reconstruction.

Improving Postoperative Nasal Airway Patency in Le Fort-Based, Maxillofacial Trauma Patients Via a Modified Nasal Packing Technique.

INTRODUCTION: Combined mid-face and nasal apparatus trauma injuries pose a significant challenge to airway patency (AW), in the immediate postoperative setting following fracture reduction. As such, the authors describe a modified technique with the goal of maintaining a patent nasal AW, while at the same time, minimizing nasopharyngeal bleeding and nasal AW edema-which can complicate patients requiring intermaxillary fixation (IMF) in the setting of pan-facial trauma. METHODS: A modified technique was devised to assist the reconstruction surgeon in avoiding the risks associated with tracheostomy placement. In an effort to avoid surgical AW complications and improve nasal AW patency in the setting of concurrent IMF and nasal trauma, the authors developed a 2-stage technique drawing upon knowledge from the literature and the authors' own experiences. TECHNIQUE: Following safe extubation, the authors insert open lumen nasal splints in both the nostrils, and suture them together to the nasal septum. If additional inner nasal support is required, polyvinyl alcohol nonabsorbable nasal packing dressing is covered with antibiotic ointment, and then placed within the nasal cavity lateral to the open lumen splints-as a way to further bolster the internal valve and mid-vault anatomy. DISCUSSION: Given the fact that traditional nasal packing with merocele/gauze dressing in concomitant to IMF reduced patients ability to ventilate, the authors felt that a modified technique should be applied. The authors' preferred materials in such patients are open lumen splint, which provides nasal AW patency along with some septum support accompanied by merocele dressing. The authors feel that by applying this technique they achieve dual objectives by supporting the traumatized nose and maintaining nasal AW patency.

Adult Cranioplasty Reconstruction With Customized Cranial Implants: Preferred Technique, Timing, and Biomaterials.

INTRODUCTION: Complex cranial defects requiring delayed reconstruction present numerous challenges. Delayed cranioplasties accompany frequent complications approaching an incidence of 35 to 40%. Therefore, the authors sought to collate their experience in hopes of sharing their perspective on several topics including technique, timing, and preferred biomaterials. METHODS: The authors' 5-year consecutive experience over 430 customized cranial implants is described herein. Since its inception in 2012, the authors' team has employed the pericranial-onlay cranioplasty technique instead of the standard epidural approach. Optimal timing for cranioplasty is determined using objective criteria such as scalp healing and parenchymal edema, close collaboration with neuroplastic surgery, conversion from autologous bone to sterile implant in instances of questionable viability/storage, and the first-line use of solid poly(methylmethacrylate) implants for uncomplicated, delayed cases, first-line porous polyethylene (MEDPOR) implants for single-stage cranioplasty, and first-line polyether-ether-ketone implants for cases with short notice. Furthermore, the use of the pterional design algorithm with temporal bulking for all customized implants has helped to correct and/or prevent temporal hollowing deformities. RESULTS: The authors' team has observed a three-fold reduction in reported complications as compared with the existing literature, with a major complication rate of 11%. The multidisciplinary center has provided an optimal stage for synergy and improved outcomes versus standard cranioplasty techniques. CONCLUSION: Secondary cranial reconstruction, or cranioplasty, can be challenging due to numerous reasons. These best practices, developed in collaboration with neuroplastic surgery and neurosurgery, appear to encompass the largest published experience to date. The authors find this approach to be both safe and reliable.

Comparative Cost Analysis of Single and Mutli-Stage Temporal Deformity Correction Following Neurosurgical Procedures.

PURPOSE: Temporal hollowing deformity (THD) is a visible concavity/convexity in the temporal fossa; a complication often seen following neurosurgical/craniofacial procedures. Although numerous techniques have been described, no study to date has shown the healthcare costs associated with temporal hollowing correction surgery. Thus, the purpose here is to compare and contrast the direct costs related to temporal cranioplasty using various methods including: liquid poly-methyl-methacrylate (PMMA) implants with screw fixation, prebent, modified titanium mesh implants, and customized cranial implants (CCIs) with dual-purpose design. Understanding the financial implications related to this frequently encountered complication will help to motivate surgeons/healthcare facilities to better prevent and manage THD. METHODS: This is a single-surgeon, single-institution retrospective review of 23 THD patients randomly selected from between 2008 and 2015. Cost analysis variables include length of hospital stay, facility/professional fees, implant material fees, payer information, reimbursement rate, and net revenue. RESULTS: Of the 23 patients, ages ranged from 23 to 68 years with a mean of 48.3 years (SD 11.6). Within this cohort, 39.1% received dual-purpose PMMA CCIs (CCI PLUS), 17.4% received modified titanium mesh implants, and 43.5% received hand-molded, liquid PMMA implants with screw fixation. Total facility and/or professional charges ranged from $1978.00 to $126478.00. Average total facility charges per patient with dual-purpose CCIs were $34775.89 (SD ±â€Š$22205.09) versus $35826.00 (SD ±â€Š$23509.93) for modified titanium mesh implants and $46547.90 (SD ±â€Š81061.70) for liquid PMMA implants with screws. Mean length of inpatient stay was 5.7 days (SD = 8.1), and did not differ between implant types (P = 0.387). CONCLUSION: Temporal hollowing deformity is an expensive complication post-neurosurgery, and in the most severe form, requires a revision surgery for definitive correction. Therefore, surgeons should take further initiatives to employ reconstructive methods capable of minimizing risk for costly revision surgery, reducing morbidity related to visible deformity and accompanying social stigmata, and improving overall patient satisfaction.

First In-Human Experience With Complete Integration of Neuromodulation Device Within a Customized Cranial Implant.

BACKGROUND: Neuromodulation devices have the potential to transform modern day treatments for patients with medicine-resistant neurological disease. For instance, the NeuroPace System (NeuroPace Inc, Mountain View, California) is a Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved device developed for closed-loop direct brain neurostimulation in the setting of drug-resistant focal epilepsy. However, current methods require placement either above or below the skull in nonanatomic locations. This type of positioning has several drawbacks including visible deformities and scalp pressure from underneath leading to eventual wound healing difficulties, micromotion of hardware with infection, and extrusion leading to premature explantation. OBJECTIVE: To introduce complete integration of a neuromodulation device within a customized cranial implant for biocompatibility optimization and prevention of visible deformity. METHODS: We report a patient with drug-resistant focal epilepsy despite previous seizure surgery and maximized medical therapy. Preoperative imaging demonstrated severe resorption of previous bone flap causing deformity and risk for injury. She underwent successful responsive neurostimulation device implantation via complete integration within a clear customized cranial implant. RESULTS: The patient has recovered well without complication and has been followed closely for 180 d. Device interrogation with electrocorticographic data transmission has been successfully performed through the clear implant material for the first time with no evidence of any wireless transmission interference. CONCLUSION: Cranial contour irregularities, implant site infection, and bone flap resorption/osteomyelitis are adverse events associated with implantable neurotechnology. This method represents a novel strategy to incorporate all future neuromodulation devices within the confines of a low-profile, computer-designed cranial implant and the newfound potential to eliminate contour irregularities, improve outcomes, and optimize patient satisfaction.

Algorithmic Approach to Overcome Scalp Deficiency in the Setting of Secondary Cranial Reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: Multidisciplinary approaches have shown improved outcomes in secondary cranial reconstruction, however, scalp deficiency remains a common obstacle for tension-free scalp closure during cranioplasty. Therefore, our objective was to create an algorithmic approach using a novel concept of "component separation" to help minimize potential complications. METHODS: The authors tested the hypothesis of achieving greater scalp mobility by way of "component separation" in a half-scalp, bilateral cadaver study, and describe within 2 clinical examples. Pterional-sized (N = 2) and hemicraniectomy-sized (N = 2) scalp flaps were dissected on 2 cadaveric heads using an internal control for each scenario. All flaps (N = 4) were created with (experimental group) and without (control group) "retaining ligament release." Total amounts of scalp mobility were measured bilaterally and compared accordingly. RESULTS: Scalp flap mobility was calculated from the sagittal midline using identical arcs of rotation. With zero tension, we observed an increased distance of movement equaling 1 cm for the "experimental" pterional flap, compared with the contralateral "control." Similarly, we found an increase of additional 2 cm in scalp mobility for the "experimental" hemicraniectomy-sized flap. CONCLUSIONS: Tension free scalp closure is most critical for achieving improved outcomes in secondary cranial reconstruction. In this study, we show that a range of 1 to 2 additional centimeters may be gained through a component separation, which is of critical value during scalp closure following cranioplasty. Therefore, based on our high volume cranioplasty experience and cadaver study presented, we offer some new insight on methods to overcome scalp deficiency accompanying secondary cranial reconstruction.

Restoration of the donor face after facial allotransplantation: digital manufacturing techniques.

INTRODUCTION: Current protocols for facial transplantation include the mandatory fabrication of an alloplastic "mask" to restore the congruency of the donor site in the setting of "open casket" burial. However, there is currently a paucity of literature describing the current state-of-the-art and available options. METHODS: During this study, we identified that most of donor masks are fabricated using conventional methods of impression, molds, silicone, and/or acrylic application by an experienced anaplastologist or maxillofacial prosthetics technician. However, with the recent introduction of several enhanced computer-assisted technologies, our facial transplant team hypothesized that there were areas for improvement with respect to cost and preparation time. RESULTS: The use of digital imaging for virtual surgical manipulation, computer-assisted planning, and prefabricated surgical cutting guides-in the setting of facial transplantation-provided us a novel opportunity for digital design and fabrication of a donor mask. The results shown here demonstrate an acceptable appearance for "open-casket" burial while maintaining donor identity after facial organ recovery. CONCLUSIONS: Several newer techniques for fabrication of facial transplant donor masks exist currently and are described within the article. These encompass digital impression, digital design, and additive manufacturing technology.